Scott Sobel, President, Media & Communications Strategies, Inc. had the opportunity to share his thoughts about the PR lessons that can be learned from Hillary Clinton’s recent illness. His piece can be seen in Bulldog Reporter, the leading source of PR views, news and tools. Scott is a former corporate public relations practitioner and major market and TV network investigative journalist with a Media Psychology MA from Touro University Worldwide.
The text of the full story is below. You can also read it online HERE.
Initial Secrecy Surrounding Hillary Clinton’s Medical Condition Holds PR Lessons for Practitioners and Journalists, Bulldog Reporter
By Scott Sobel, MA, Media Psychology; President, Media & Communications Strategies
January 2, 2013
I just fielded a call from a frustrated State Department beat reporter at a major news services about government spokespersons not immediately releasing every bit of information concerning Secretary Clinton’s medical condition. The call to me for comment came a few hours before a clear announcement that Clinton would fully recover from a blood clot in her head. The reporter wondered why the government was apparently holding back? The conversation with the beat reporter carries media relations lessons for both reporters and those of us who are spokespersons.
The reporter’s job, of course, is to press hard for every bit of information and the reporter had the sense “State” was holding back. The implication was the spokespersons for Mrs. Clinton were doing the public a disservice. I disagreed.
I explained to the reporter that the government spokespersons were actually doing a responsible job by not succumbing to pressure and feeding speculative fires. Once the reporter heard what I believed were reasonable actions on the part of the spokespersons, the reporter calmed down and took a more balanced approach to the story. The overriding lesson here are 1) that a PR practitioner who calmly and logically explains reasons for actions and 2) understands a journalist’s needs 3) avoids conflict, 4) reduces the likelihood of a negative story and 5) builds credibility and a positive relationship.
Here’s a summation of my interview with the reporter:
All the stakeholders including journalists and the general public need to take a look at the reports about Mrs. Clinton’s condition through the eyes of others. It’s understood that reporters need to fill their news hole and, of course, break stories but consider what hangs in the balance.
The Secretary’s health and ability to represent the US and lead State have incredibly important implications and it is not at all irresponsible for spokespersons to be cautious initially and not completely transparent about her condition. Of course, Mrs. Clinton could also be a future Presidential candidate! You don’t want to make a communication mistake based on a premature statement that could impact any of those factors.
I further explained to the reporter that spokespersons absolutely do need to tell the truth as they know it and not mislead. It is much better to say, for instance, “we can’t answer some specific questions now because doctors are in the investigation and treatment phase,” as opposed to misdirection or an outright lie which will undermine the credibility of State and indeed the US government when final facts eventually are revealed. Look what happened at Benghazi … a very, very apt comparison in this case.
So what is acceptable? I thought any of the following statements were legitimate and should satisfy a reporter’s needs unless Mrs. Clinton was actually in grave jeopardy (which, as it turns out, she reportedly isn’t). Spokespersons can say that Clinton is getting the best medical care and, rather than fueling speculation, “we will report more specifics about her condition when we can. As for now, Mrs. Clinton, is recovering, doctors are investigating further and the duties of State are not in jeopardy as there is a system in place that deals with all contingencies (including staff illness) and decision-making.”
A government spokesperson should add information about all of the support sent to Mrs. Clinton from her famous family, colleagues and even heads of state. It is always good to personalize the folks or organization you represent.
A polite reminder to the journalist – the speculation surrounding Mrs. Clinton’s condition or the condition of anyone who is a leader does have cascading implications and must be handled very carefully and honestly. Think about the drama and results that surrounded the illness and eventual death of Apple CEO Steve Jobs.
Speculation about Jobs health affected stock, employee morale, competitors’ actions, consumer reaction to the Apple product and more. I asked the reporter to consider how Mrs. Clinton’s health correspondingly affects US reputation, foreign policy and international business despite her imminent resignation from her post.
Final thoughts. Relationship building and conversation between a PR practitioner and beat journalists before there are emergencies are great investments and will undoubtedly result in better coverage for you and your stakeholders. Getting to know the reporters and letting them know about your concerns and humanizing you and your job will definitely pay dividends.