Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Best Public Relations and Branding Practices for the New Pope: How a New Leader Can Show the Way Out of a Crisis of Perception

Wednesday, March 20th, 2013

Below is a piece authored by Media & Communication Strategies President Scott Sobel for Bulldog Reporter.

Critics are accusing the news media of covering the papal selection process and result like a political event or entertainment. Why should that kind of coverage surprise anyone? I think there is little doubt that Pope Francis is absolutely savvy and is taking advantage of this seminal PR moment. Of course he knows the media is reporting his every single public move as they would report on a new president or a mega-corporation celebrity CEO. Pope Francis’ job description is very different than either but we can learn about how a new leader has an incredibly powerful moment, a tipping-point, when they first step into a new job. The new leader can seize the day, carpe diem, to influence public perception and their own organization or, in the case of the Pope, inspire the 1.2 billion Catholics around the world and the church’s vast internal organization.

Let’s look at Pope Francis’ ascension in the context of what any new leader should do to help their brand using applicable psychological theory, especially when that brand is struggling or in crisis. Everyone knows the Catholic Church is laboring through a sensitive time of crisis of faith and credibility right now following priest sex scandals and questions by its flock about the church’s political and social dogma.

Know your audience. Any leader and PR practitioner must understand what their audience needs or thinks it needs and leverage the strengths they have that satisfy those needs. Can the new Pope drastically affect the Church’s brand in a positive way … absolutely, depending on what your definition is for the successful branding of today’s Catholic Church.

Of course, the Catholic Church, especially in the US, is also experiencing a crisis of definition. Should the church be focused on responding to the predilections of its members? Polls show the majority of Catholics want female priests and most parishioners support the use of contraceptives and even cry for priests to be able to have families while the Vatican and its priests officially preach opposite positions from the pulpit. Early Christians grew their church as a movement of vox populi, a people’s voice, and Christ’s Gospel challenged apostle Saint Peter as the first pope to lead “fishers of men.” Today, conservative Catholics don’t believe the Church should grow at the expense of sacrificing many of its organizational edicts, like celibacy for priests, established millennia ago. If you have faith in the popular polls, that conservative position is costing the church dearly.

Can Pope Francis control the Catholic Church’s brand the way a CEO can? Consider the following comparative definitions.

The papal definition according to the Catholic Ecclesiastical Canon 331: “The office uniquely committed by the Lord to Peter, the first of the Apostles, and to be transmitted to his successors, abides in the Bishop of the Church of Rome. He is head of the College of Bishops, the Vicar of Christ, and the Pastor of the universal Church here on earth. Consequently, by virtue of his office, he has supreme, full, immediate, and universal ordinary power in the Church, and he can always freely exercise this power.”

The corporate CEO definition according to Investopedia: “The highest ranking executive in a company whose main responsibilities include developing and implementing high-level strategies, making major corporate decisions, managing the overall operations and resources of a company, and acting as the main point of communication between the board of directors and the corporate operations. The CEO will often have a position on the board, and in some cases is even the chair.”

So, let’s put aside who or what chose Pope Francis (divine inspiration, the Conclave of Cardinals, a political process, a quasi-corporate process based on organizational goals) and take away additional branding and PR lessons from what Pope Francis has done and is doing, at least from what we see publically.

Choose a brand name that expresses your mission and product. Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires chose to be christened again as Pope Francis, saying, he was inspired by Saint Francis of Assisi — the embodiment of an advocate for the poor.

The pontiff has already been famously quoted, “”I’d like a poor church, for the poor.” He was photographed, and that photo has miraculously appeared on the Internet, as cardinal kissing the feet of poor parishioners. He is a Jesuit, a Catholic sect that takes vows of poverty.

Pope Francis will inevitably be deeply involved in church politics and business along with his spiritual leadership. He will have to have opinions and even act on various controversial doctrine and secular positions and certainly will have to deal with the pedophile priest scandal but choosing his papal name and his initial comments certainly send a very clear message that positioning for the poor can overshadow all other issues and set that symbolic brand in the public mind.

A big question is whether the Catholic leadership, from the Vatican to Cardinals to Bishops to parish priests, will publicize the reinforced mission of the church to help the poor? The church has ignored the opportunity to create a public drumbeat of its incredible good works and tried to put out its crisis fires reactively instead of proactively. First indications are that Pope Francis is leading proactively right out of the gate.

 

To Comment or Hide? Business Leadership Lessons Learned from Carnival Corp.’s CEO Micky Arison

Tuesday, February 26th, 2013

By Scott Sobel, MA, Media Psychology; President, Media & Communications Strategies

Members of the news media are accusing billionaire Micky Arison of having a split personality when it comes to which public face he shows as the respective leader of his two very different businesses.

Arison owns the Miami Heat basketball team and is known as a gregarious, visible, accessible and friendly sports CEO. You can see him at games and read his thoughts often on social media.

As CEO of the publicly traded Carnival Corporation, Arison’s public persona is a much smaller PR footprint, especially when the brand is suffering a reputation challenge as it is right now.

The lawsuits are starting to roll in like waves lapping against the side of the monster vacation ship Carnival Triumph, the apparent victim of an engine fire that resulted in more than 4,000 guests trapped on the disabled liner … food supplies were a problem and human waste disposal an even larger issue.

Forbes reported recently, “Carnival has not been on a lucky streak lately, to say the least. Last year one of the company’s luxury liners ran aground off the coast of Italy, killing 32 people. These two disasters taken together — last year’s being many times more awful — are the PR-equivalent of getting pantsed at the televised funeral of a patient that died on your operating table. Quite embarrassing indeed.”

Arison was also relatively quiet during the Concordia tragedy, and then again when another Carnival liner was left adrift by yet another fire two years ago.

Arison has taken a lot of heat (no basketball pun intended) from the news media accusing him of a disappearing act concerning the sometimes-volatile cruise line business. His Carnival Cruise Line CEO Gerry Cahill, however, has been put front and center in the media spotlight for the Carnival Triumph catastrophe, offering sympathy for guests and thanks for no one being injured, regardless of the lawsuits alleging the opposite … to be fair Arison did express the same sentiments on his own Tweets.

The news media did indeed take Arison to task for attending Heat games while his cruise ship Triumph floundered and the story led newscasts. Arguably, he could have waited and learned from other CEO’s and leaders who firmly planted their respective feet in their mouths by being flip during crisis. Remember the reaction to BP CEO Tony Hayward’s infamous quote about wanting “my life back” and going for a sail in 2010 while his rig Deepwater Horizon vomited oil into the Gulf of Mexico? Or, when former President George W. Bush ranted on a golf course about stopping “the terrorist killers” in 2002 and then blithely continued to play and asked reporters to watch his next drive?

Let’s look at the tale of the tape for bottom line results when the lights went out on the Carnival Triumph.

Carnival stock share value dropped a bit after the first reports of the Carnival Triumph’s power loss hit the media but things got much worse when the situation continued. The corporation’s $39 per share value dropped precipitously about two days later, falling off a cliff after Feb 12, coincidently the same timeframe when Arison attended a Heat game, probably not the best time for the CEO to be in the public eye.

The same Forbes article referenced earlier also makes another PR-related observation, “Most recently, Arison — along with Carnival Corp. Director Pier Luigi Foschini — donated a portion of his 2012 compensation to charities such as Robin Hood Relief Fund, Habitat for Humanity International, Save the Children and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Fund to Advance New York City, in support of Hurricane Sandy relief efforts. Arison, who also owns the Miami Heat basketball team, earned $6,497,785 last year, $906,400 of which came from his Carnival salary.”

Forbes continued to report: “That’s one of the ways people do try to improve their image after any kind of embarrassing situation,” said Stacy Palmer, editor of the Washington D.C.-based Chronicle of Philanthropy. Those already interested in philanthropy can use it as an image-scrubber, she added. Goldman Sachs was among banks that increased their giving following hard times.”

What are the takeaways?

A great business leader with diverse responsibilities needs to understand the differences in their businesses and game plan accordingly but recognize their personal brand reflects all of their endeavors. In Arison’s case, a pro sports team has different audiences and much less oversight than a publicly owned cruise line. The personalities and needs of their employees are also different.

Commonsensically, I don’t believe Arison’s reputation as CEO of the Heat will suffer and his association with the cruise line business won’t affect the team’s business. Sports fans are not going to boycott a LeBron James basketball game because an owner’s cruise ship may or may not be in crises, unless the CEO were to say or do something really, really callus. The Heat losing a playoff won’t keep a family from taking a Carnival cruise either.

Reporters will always want to get quotes from the leader at the very top of an organization. That leader may distance themselves from egregious circumstances to either lay blame at someone else’s feet -which generally is not well accepted by the news media, the general public and even shareholders — or to rightfully-so allow the manager closest to the situation be answerable. As witnessed by the media criticism leveled at Micky Arison, you have to be thick-skinned regardless of which visibility path you take because being out front when all is sunshine and light also raises the expectation of being equally accessible during darker times.

Scott Sobel is president of Media & Communications Strategies, Inc., a Washington, DC-based public relations firm that manages reputation and communications challenges of all kinds worldwide. He is also a former corporate public relations practitioner and major market and TV network investigative journalist. Scott has an MA In Media Psychology from Touro University Worldwide.

Scott Sobel Featured in Bulldog Reporter’s Daily Dog

Friday, January 18th, 2013

It’s No Accident: Lance Armstrong’s Kind of PR Dilemma is Becoming More Frequent 

By Scott Sobel, MA, Media Psychology; President, Media & Communications Strategies

It seems like every day another entertainment celebrity, sports hero, significant CEO or politician or maybe a religious figure, is in front of cameras or an audience to ring their hands, mouth a mea culpa and ask for forgiveness. They are self–admitted embezzlers, thieves of all kinds, adulterers, con artists, and worse … high-profile people who have made mistakes and generally have gotten caught with their hands in the proverbial cookie jar or a horrifying list of other metaphoric treasure chests.

Eyes red, generally avoiding the direct gaze of their audience or interrogator, oftentimes a spouse or supporters surrounding them, but maybe not too closely.

You get the picture, we’ve all seen it an astonishing number of times, and the list continues to balloon. Now Lance Armstrong follows in the footsteps of Arnold, Tiger, Elliot, Bernie, Lindsay (comparatively fewer women!), Bill, John, Ted and on and on — world without end, amen. The famous confessors are so recognizable that their last names aren’t necessary.

I believe the ubiquity of these kinds of confessions is directly linked to the pervasive media (all kinds), evolving forensic techniques (DNA testing) and recording technology like iPhones or so many other devices with tiny video or still cameras.

Simply put, these days it is easier to be in the public eye and easier to be caught.

Expect to see more celebrity revelations and the time-tested reputation management litany: Common sense tells you, and we certainly counsel clients, that:

A public personality, especially one who has a great expectation of being convicted because of prima facie evidence like a smoking email, needs to ask forgiveness as part of the rehabilitation of reputation.

The longer you wait, the harder it is to get forgiveness.

Delay the inevitable confession and the more damage will be done to your reputation because the public, including voters and ad sponsors, become more convinced that you are a bad person and that you are less likely to be truthful in the future.

Gather your friends around you (Oprah if she isn’t booked, great get Oprah!).

Know your enemies and be ready to blunt attacks.

Start to slowly do good works that can at least help you climb back into the good graces of the public, your business associates, constituencies and maybe, just maybe, advertising executives.

There are innumerable other nuanced actions to take, few of them are surprising, the success comes in the execution of the plan for redemption and the sincerity of the apology which is generally in direct proportion to the likeability of the celebrity apologist.

I won’t bore you with all of the famous confession quotes on the Web spilling out of the mouths of all the pundits now, enough said that every one has a more interesting way of announcing that a confession is the first step on the way to a new life. If you are in the business of public relations or media psychology, you and your clients will be well served to recognize all of us humans are flawed. Most of us recognize our own imperfections and are willing to forgive others, depending on the extent of the transgression, if only the transgressor admits his or her human frailty. The perfect and the unrepentant generally don’t get a pass from us sinners.

So all the signs are there, the trends are climbing upward, the new technology and evaporating ability to be private will further afflict those who live in the public eye. Lance will not be the last of the celebrity confessors. He will also not be the last famous or powerful person to be surrounded by yes-men and women who tell the boss he is bulletproof and will live in the glow of success forever, no matter how they got into that spotlight.

Scott Sobel is president of Media & Communications Strategies, Inc., a Washington, DC-based public relations firm that manages reputation and communications challenges of all kinds worldwide. He is also a former corporate public relations practitioner and major market and TV network investigative journalist. Scott has an MA In Media Psychology from Touro University Worldwide.

Original article can be found here

Unique Internship Opportunity Available in the Nation’s Capitol

Sunday, January 6th, 2013

We are looking for an intern who is a dynamic communicator capable of managing multiple projects for a variety of clients from different industries. Our clients range from aviation, financial serves, to architecture and online education.

It’s a New Year and a new Congress with great opportunities available for this intern – from media outreach, social media engagement, lobbying, and press kit development to research and new business collaboration. Candidate needs to prioritize and meet deadlines in a 10 to 15 hour weekly schedule. A stipend of $10/hour is provided. A college degree in communications, political science, business, or equivalent experience is preferred.

For consideration, please send a resume, cover letter, and a writing sample to klanham@macstrategies.com

Scott Sobel, President of Media & Communications Strategies, Comments on the Public’s Reaction to Hillary Clinton’s Health Issues

Wednesday, January 2nd, 2013

What is privacy these days to a public figure? Gone are the days when these individuals could keep their physical ailments under rap. It is amazing to think there was a time when public figures such as President Franklin D. Roosevelt could even hide the fact he was in a wheelchair. True, in almost all photographs he is seen sitting, but he is in a chair to give the illusion that his polio poliomyelitis was less than it was. In today’s world, these photographic tricks don’t work the way they used to and individuals such as Hillary Clinton find their medical problems on Wikipedia before they have even had a chance to call all their loved ones.

Scott Sobel, President of Media & Communications Strategies, recently was interviewed by Nicole Gaouette of Bloomberg to comment on a story about the media and public reaction to Hillary Clinton’s recent hospitalization. An excerpt of the story with Sobel’s comments can be read below:

Clinton Expected to Make Full Recovery from Blood Clot, Bloomberg
January 2, 2012

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was found to have a blood clot in a vein that runs between her brain and her skull, her doctors said today in a statement. Clinton has suffered no neurological damage or stroke, is in good spirits and is expected to make a full recovery, Dr. Lisa Bardack of the Mt. Kisco Medical Group and Dr. Gigi El- Bayoumi of George Washington University said in the statement released by the State Department.

Clinton’s hospitalization in New York City yesterday fueled rumors about her health, highlighting the issues raised by a public figure’s private health challenges. The secretary, named yesterday as the most admired woman in the U.S. in a poll by Gallup Inc., has been called a potential 2016 presidential candidate, heightening scrutiny of her condition.

“Her situation has remarkable, complex implications for politics and business around the world, and the process of government in the United States,” said Scott Sobel, president of Media & Communications Strategies based in Washington. “Her immediate and long-term condition is really important for a number of stakeholders, even — and it’s a very, very long list — of other countries.”

An administration official who has been monitoring Clinton’s progress said that at no point has she been incapacitated. The period when Clinton was least able to work was when she had the stomach virus, according to the official, who asked not to be identified discussing her health.

Throughout, Clinton has been keeping in regular touch with senior leadership at the State Department and the White House, according to the department.

The absence of detailed information on her condition until the latest report from Clinton’s physicians left an information vacuum. Speculation filled media from the Daily Beast website to the tabloid National Enquirer, whose cover screamed “Hillary Clinton Brain Cancer Drama!” Assistant Secretary of State Philippe Reines called the Enquirer report “absolute nonsense.”

The administration official said Clinton’s media team has tried to be forthright, issuing seven statements in the three and a half weeks the secretary has been ill, every time there has been a shift in her condition. The continued rumors might be driven in part by the intense public and media interest in Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, the official said. There are times when anything the Clintons do creates a rabid media environment, the official said.

Crisis management experts such as Sobel see no problem in the way Clinton’s team has responded. Sobel points to “everybody’s hunger to find out what’s going on, especially the media. They’ve got to fill that news hole.”

Have Social Media Platforms Become A Venue For Lying?

Friday, October 5th, 2012

How to Stay Honest In the Ever-Changing Digital World

There was a time when people had to wait days, possibly even weeks, for news to reach their doorstep; today that’s not case. The minute news breaks, it is all over the internet for anyone to see. But perhaps more alarming, is that anyone can become a journalist or editor in today’s viral world. The world of blogs and Wikipedia has allowed internet users to not only express their stories and opinions, but also for them to brand themselves as “experts”. Although the Internet has opened the door for numerous technological advances, it has also opened an even greater door for disparity and misleading news.

 

Mark Schaefer of Business Grow gave the perfect case study on this in his article last month. He writes:

 

“One of the biggest ironies of the social web is that almost any post you read will pontificate about the need for authenticity. I heard a guru guy speak about this last week. Authenticity. Authenticity. Authenticity. Yet [the guru’s] Twitter avatar photo is 10 years old. At least. His blog is covered with badges about this list or that list he is starring on. Most powerful Twitter this or that.  Some of the lists are made up by his friends. Some of them are made up by him. Most of his blog opinions are simply repeated quotes from the other gurus that he has commandeered as his own.”

 

What does this mean for us communications professionals? It means that we have to be honest and truthful regarding any information we put out on the web for clients. A report done by Trendwatch.com announced that, “With 92 per cent of global consumers saying they trust ‘earned media’ (word-of-mouth and recommendations from friends and family), above all other forms of advertising, businesses must find ways to ‘organic’ connect with consumers to be successful.” If you are wondering what earned media is, Crowd Science defines earned media, or free media, as publicity gained through non-advertising promotional efforts – so things like press releases, PR reps calling up journalists and placing stories with news outlets. Sharing your earned media on your clients’ social media pages is a great way to repurpose content and keep your viral page fresh, and it also it is beneficial in showcasing your skills as a PR professional.

 

Beyond posting new and relevant content, also make sure you are engaging with your viral followers and answering their questions. Offering fans and followers surveys is another way to find out how you can be better a resource to them and be completely transparent about areas you feel you can improve on. Anyone can label themselves an “expert,” but it is up to the individual communications professionals to be “sources” by making sure they are placing truthful content and responding to questions in a timely manner.

MACStrategies Shares Media Training Expertise With Legal Firm Media Professionals

Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

In January, MACStrategies President Scott Sobel presented a seminar about media training to the Legal Firm Media Professionals, a group of top legal marketers and public relations professionals in the Washington, DC area.

Beth Huffman, director of media relations at Dechert law firm, praised Scott’s presentation:

“Thanks to Scott Sobel who put on a FABULOUS meeting in January on media training… for those who would like to get a private screening of the training tape, or learn more, he is available at sobel@macstrategies.com.”

How Do Consumers Know When They are Being Sold to or Persuaded?

Friday, January 20th, 2012

As often happens a national journalist asked us for our opinion on a business topic, in this case the story is about how consumers can evaluate whether they are being sold to or not when watching or hearing commercials, PSA’s or other communications. Much of our counseling for business to business or crisis communications PR is based on media psychology and even Dr. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theories. The Media & Communications Psychology Master’s program at Touro University Worldwide (www.tuw.edu) has been invaluable as a basis for my advice to high profile clients and for media training – once again what I learned at TUW is applicable.

We tend to categorize issues into “what can hurt me and what can help me?” We are usually naturally skeptical of overt sales pitches because we figure the pitcher is trying to get something from us that might take away from what we have or even be dangerous to us.

We are more susceptible to covert sales pitches which have us subtly buying concepts which may lead to us buying services or goods.

There are many exceptions here and sometimes an overt sales pitch is warranted to blunt attacks to credibility, as in politicians wanting to get out in front of accusations that are hurtful.

So with that context, consumers should always be thoughtful about what they see or hear and understand if it is in the media, the proposition is there to sell you something. You have to follow logical lines of reasoning and intuition to figure out what is being covertly sold and decide if you NEED or WANT it.

Hence the old saw, if it seems to be too good to be true, it probably is – caveat emptor, consumer beware.

Learning from La Redoute: How to Handle Damage Control

Monday, January 9th, 2012

Our firm has several international clients and is constantly involved in reputation management and mitigation constantly. We are retained by corporations, large law firms, nonprofits, etc. And a primary rule of international damage control or any kind of crisis mitigation really is to identify your audiences, know the context and culture and don’t make things worse.

Twentieth Century American Humorist Will Rogers was right when he said, “When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging,” and that advice is good for France retailer  La Redoute at this time. The company has done well to apologize, they should also make sure they are not doing anything else wrong and shouldn’t be caught making such foolish mistakes again and certainly shouldn’t encourage continuous online dialogue about the matter. French sensibilities will allow this kind of faux pas where it probably would have played out worse in the US or UK.

Nonetheless, the definition of crisis is a “tipping point” and the company will be judged on how well it handles the scandal more than the mistake itself. Remember how the mishandling of the Toyota crisis and the BP boss asking for his “life back” added fuel to the fire.  La Redoute should ask itself who has really been hurt here, and make decisions based on audiences and cultures, and then move on.

 

 

Lowe’s falls victim to pressure to pull advertising from ‘All-American Muslim Family’

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

In trying to avoid a controversy last week, it seems the home improvement company Lowe’s sawed its way into a bigger one.  From the looks of it Lowe’s had good intentions when it signed on to advertise on TLC’s “All-American Muslim Family,” a show which profiles the day-to-day lives of several families of Muslim faith in Michigan. But the company bowed to growing pressure from an influential anti-Muslim group to yank its advertising from the show. The move was provocative, generating strong reactions from people who either decried or supported the decision on Facebook and other social media.

We believe Lowe’s has the right to advertise wherever the company sees fit. And while we don’t presume to know all the inside information in a hypersensitive situation such as this one, Lowe’s was indeed caught between a rock and hard place because the negative publicity the anti-Muslim group had generated around the show’s advertising was already beginning to compromise its image. The anti-Muslim group was essentially waiting to pounce on Lowe’s and other advertisers knowing that in the post-September 11 America we live in it could galvanize support for its views.

However, criticism against Lowe’s actions continues to grow, so much so that the company is now deleting negative comments from its Facebook page. The key take-away from this situation is that companies need to be very clear about the pros and cons of the mediums they spend their public relations and advertising monies. This comes in handy when they need to defend their decisions or have a change of heart.  Lastly, remember that choosing a thoughtful communications approach and sticking with it supersedes experimenting with social media without alternative plans in place should a campaign backfire. We are hoping Lowe’s will roll out an effective plan to help remedy this controversy.