Archive for the ‘Communications’ Category

Scott Sobel On Why News Releases Still Matter

Monday, May 20th, 2013

Scott Sobel, President of Media & Communications Strategies, believes news releases still matter. He responds to a Commpro.biz article on the declining value of news releases. Scott writes:

The call-and-send-a-release strategy is even more valuable when you are pitching a novice desk-assistant or editor who you get interested in a story and then needs something concrete in their hand or in an e-mail to pass to a decision-maker.

We are in the PR trenches and work every day with media outlets like 60 Minutes, ABC News’ Ross Unit, Washington Post, Huffington Post, legal and aviation trades, national radio and every kind of local media outlet – even international news outlets. Our news releases are part of almost every engagement; the release is not the only tool used, but one that should not be ignored.

For more, read the full article here on Commpro.biz.

Look For the Helpers: Anticipate Both the Good and the Bad News When Handling a Crisis

Monday, May 13th, 2013

By Scott Sobel, MA, Media Psychology; President, Media & Communications Strategies. This post originally appeared here on Bulldog Reporter.

 

As a society, as a nation, we are now decompressing from the horrific events and outcomes surrounding the Boston Marathon bombing and the chemical explosion in West, Texas. As public relations practitioners who have to prepare for all kinds and degrees of crisis events, we need to take accounting of how those events were handled or mishandled by first responders, police, medical teams, political spokespersons, the news media and us.

 

The good news is that by and large the PR people and spokespersons who I witnessed did a laudable job of being as even-handed as possible, attempting not to speculate and looked for calming information that attempted to keep the public from panic. The more experienced and responsible journalists did the same in the face of the constant live reporting which showcases the best in journalism and also put a spotlight on the very worst reportage.

 

The ironic bad news is that we are collectively getting better at handling these kinds of terrorism or mass disasters because unfortunately it appears we have had to weather more of these incidents or, at least, have had more of these incidents reported 24/7 by the ubiquitous media, both mainstream and social. We are now becoming practiced at dealing with disaster.

 

Observation. Almost immediately after both tragedies erupted we would hear facts and warnings from official spokespersons and then we would hear, e.g., – from a Boston Celtics spokesperson, “Our Celtics family and our fans join all Bostonians in demonstrating our city’s great strength by coming together to stand as one to get through this difficult time,” or, from a West, Texas first responder, “Everybody knows everybody. We know people who didn’t make it, so we are all here for each other.”

 

It is commonsense to look for that silver lining in the face of chaos and danger but PR professionals need to make sure the silver lining comments and strategies are planned for proactively and not ad hoc and reactively. If you do fashion a silver lining plan, it should not be created as an afterthought but as an integral part of the news and healing process. We all need to know that there is order and potential good outcomes to help us balance our emotions and reactions. The silver lining plan is good and essential PR.

 

Again, balancing the bad with the good is needed, not a PR luxury, especially doing a service for families and young people who need to know there is order out of chaos. It is our responsibility as communications professionals to build on the good societal and personal frameworks so we can weather the inevitable bad, or what some describe as evil events. There is additionally an expectation of balanced communications from our clients and stakeholders. For more of a structured psychological perspective, consider the following comments soon after the Boston Bombing from Touro University Worldwide’s Media Psychologist Darlene Mininni, PhD.:

The Boston Bombing: The Media & What Kids Need To Know

 

The round-the-clock media coverage of the events in Boston is understandable. Our anxious minds find something soothing about information—even if the news is scary—because we want desperately to understand what’s happening. We want to know that everything will be okay. We want to know the bad guys have been caught.

 

At the same time, the media’s relentless analysis can give the impression— particularly to children—that the world is a terrible and frightening place, and we are all just one-step away from harm when we walk out our front door.

 

For that reason, it’s important for us to highlight the positive aspects of this story as well. Not in a Pollyanna-way that suggests everything is fine, but in a real way. It’s necessary to talk about the people who have opened their homes to others, sent food to first responders and provided an outpouring of support and kindness to those in need.

 

A popular post on Facebook this week is a quote from the beloved children’s television host Mr. Rogers:

When I was a boy, and I would see scary things in the news, my mother would say to me, ‘Look for the helpers. You will always find people who are helping.’

My daughter was 3-1/2 when two planes deliberately crashed into the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers in New York City. It was a devastating experience that traumatized our country. As a former New Yorker, I was deeply affected by the horrible images I saw of my hometown.

 

I thought long and hard about how to explain this event my preschool-age daughter in a way that her young mind could grasp. I worried that the way I described the events would influence her view of the world. I finally told her, “A few people did a bad thing and hit the buildings with their planes. And now thousands of people are helping to make it better.”

 

I hoped that explanation would ease her into the realities of life. Yes, sometimes bad things happen. Really bad. But there’s also good in the world. A lot of good.

What to tell your children about these events will differ depending on their age:

  • Young children should be shielded from violent or graphic imagery on television and the Internet. They need to know that they are safe, secure and protected by the adults around them.
  • Older children might have questions about the event and why it happened. Answer their questions and explain the details without getting overly sensational or frightening.

 

And keep in mind that we adults can be easily overwhelmed by the constant barrage of news, too. For me, as I follow the media’s coverage, I am reminded that terrible things happen in life. I grieve for the families and the community affected.

 

And then I think about the courage, bravery and kindness of the people who helped. I think about the good in this story because it’s always there.

 

As Dr. Mininni underlines, we all have a need to know what is happening surrounding these tragedies, and I submit, we have the same need to know about all kinds of news that generally has a negative component with conflict between the bad and good aspects of the storyline.

 

The need to know is, of course, the primary driver in our communications business, period. We have to be prepared to accurately tell all parts of any story and not overlook the good news because some might think it is “soft.” The silver lining component of crisis PR is a legitimate part of the story when told as part of the overall narrative context and when properly prioritized. I am not advocating having an opening statement that emphasize good news when a bad news story is breaking but there is no reason at all not to end that kind of statement with a silver lining comment. Look and plan for the hope element…look for the helpers.

 

Scott Sobel is president of Media & Communications Strategies, Inc., a Washington, DC-based public relations firm that manages reputation and communications challenges of all kinds worldwide. www.macstrategies.com. He is also a former corporate public relations practitioner and major market and TV network investigative journalist with a Media Psychology MA from Touro University Worldwide www.TUW.edu.

ABC.com Asks Media & Communication Strategies About the Art of the Apology

Friday, April 5th, 2013

Mark Sanford, former governor and Congressman from South Carolina, is running for a return to the House of Representatives. ABC.com contacted Scott Sobel, president of Media & Communication Strategies, for comment.

Best Public Relations and Branding for the New Pope — Part Two

Monday, March 25th, 2013

By Scott Sobel, MA, Media Psychology; President, Media & Communications Strategies

This is Part Two of Scott’s PR and branding analysis of Pope Francis’ ascension for Bulldog Reporter. See Part One here.

Everyone knows the Catholic Church is laboring through a sensitive time of crisis of faith and credibility right now following priest sex scandals and questions by its flock about the church’s political and social dogma. Let’s put aside who or what chose Pope Francis and take away additional branding and PR lessons from what he has done and is doing, at least from what we see publically:

Walk the walk and don’t just talk the talk. Pope Francis decided to choose his new name that set a tone for his brand and the church’s rebranding of serving the poor and at the same time he dropped the ornate garments of his predecessor and rode on a bus with fellow priests to his public appointments.

The Pontiff didn’t just choose a symbolic name but immediately created credibility in his brand by taking action that said, hey I mean what I say, believe me, believe I will take the church (my organization) in this direction. It’s like the new CEO of a food manufacturer with a product contamination problem saying, “My company problems are being fixed, our foods are now safe,” and then publically taking a bite out of his company’s hot dogs.

The buck stops here. Pope Francis has not only been seen and heard from a high balcony at the Vatican, removed from his public, he has been making statements to reporters, seen with his flock and photographed petting a blind guest’s guide dog. The previous Pope almost always spoke from script while Pope Francis has been speaking off-the-cuff, no script, speaking from the heart.

He is connecting and relating to the common man, that congregation, that target audience, he has spoken to from the minute he was named pope, taking advantage of his newness when there is so much scrutiny of every single moment of his public life.

Who do you trust? As human beings we process and decide in the very first few seconds of meeting each other whether we like and trust whom we have met. Those first impressions are incredibly powerful for us, especially if we are meeting a new leader who can make, in some cases, life-changing decisions. Pope Francis apparently understands this dynamic.

We all pay attention to change. Change and the recognition of something new that can help or hurt us is a primal human reaction. The new pope looks like he understands this focus we have and is playing to that focus. Some leaders actually manufacture change and designate a “new” direction in order to take advantage of our interest in something new. Remember President Roosevelt’s “New Deal” and JFK’s “New Frontier.”

And, by the way, Pope Francis is indeed the first pontiff from the New World.

Unified message and playing to your strength. A time of crisis is also an opportunity for leveraging new perception and growing business because of a sharp focus on what a new leader does … how he/she handles a crisis. Churches and all entities always do better when there is reasonable transparency and correction after a crisis is reveals as opposed to cover-ups.

Pope Francis is playing to the universal positive perception of what a church can and should do for its congregation, it primary audience, during good times or during a time of crisis. The new pontiff is playing to the church’s strength, which is to be charitable, supportive and forgiving. He is cutting through the clutter of all the negative perceptions and realities and zeroing in on who he is and has been and how he wants his church to be known.

Pope Francis is very effectively setting an example of leadership, credibility and action. He is choosing a branding position of strength, an unquestionable position that will mitigate problems and set a tone for future success. His challenge, and the challenge for managing all successful organizations, is the difficulty of consistency. Leaders must stick to their initial mission statements and keep doing what they promised to do or risk being seen as hypocritical which plunges their organizations into even worse positions. Let’s all hope the Pope keeps his promises and sets examples for all kinds of leaders who struggle with resurrecting their respective brands in their respective businesses, whether they are fishing for the souls of men or trying to improve sales and providing redemption for stockholders.

Public Relations: A Value Proposition

Friday, February 8th, 2013

By Joy Scott, MBA, President Scott Public Relations. Read the original article here.

What is the value of PR? This question comes up often in today’s resource-conscious environment, especially for industries ranging from insurance PR and technology PR to healthcare PR. Below are some key ways PR will bring value to your healthcare, insurance or technology company:

PR communications have more weight than marketing and sales communications. These communications are told within the context of our industry and with the benefit of third-party editorial credibility. *Typically, a PR communication is valued at least 3X the impact and value of a sales and marketing communication.

PR generates leads. By pushing quality content out to the public, a company’s search engine optimization will increase, making it easier for prospective clients or partners to find you when searching the internet. This in turn drives people to your website and/or educational materials or to read an article about your company.

PR supports sales. It creates awareness and credibility of that company which paves the way for a positive reception to sales messages. And, it gives the sales force numerous articles and “did you know” items that they can use as touch-points with customers. Without a PR program in place, the sales force would have the extra burden of education, reputation building, and communication that is very hard for sales to accomplish alone.

PR is one of the few ways you can communicate directly with senior executives in customer companies. This becomes increasingly more important as your company continues to grow in size and scope.

PR communicates the distinct competencies of your service lines, which in turn supports your value proposition.

PR tells the corporate growth story, which is important to customers, investors, and acquisition partners.

PR builds positive “share of discussion,” which research has proven to correlate to share of market.

PR helps to define your message, and makes it real with examples, case studies and stories that customers can relate to and believe in, providing that important step between hearing a marketing or sales message and understanding that your company’s services and products really do solve problems for “people like me.”

PR creates unique, brand-building programs that set your company apart.

PR gives consistency to the messaging in a variety of venues and channels.

The Value of LinkedIn: Don’t Underestimate the Underused

Friday, February 1st, 2013

Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest – with so many viral platforms to stay on top of, how do you know which one is valuable for you and your clients? It can be hard to judge sometimes which is the best fit, but one platform that is often overlooked that should not be is LinkedIn. LinkedIn is a great way to grow your client’s business and get the word out about your own firm. Media & Communications Strategies has come with our simple tips list to help you kick-start your LinkedIn profile:

 

- Having connections on LinkedIn is everything – It increases your search ranking, it connects you to business opportunities, and it allows you to see what others in your industry are up to.

- One of LinkedIn’s great features is that it recommends people for you add. Spending an hour looking up connections will increase your visibility and your company’s visibility. People who have been in the workforce for a number of years can definitely achieve at least 200-300.

- We recommended checking your  “recommended connections” at least three times a week to see if there is anyone you should add. LinkedIn updates this function a lot and it’s a great tool.

- Being part of groups is an important way to grow your visibility in your sector. For example, if you work in law, you should all be in networking/legal groups and be following legal threads.

- Once you join these groups, click on the “Groups” tab at the top of your LinkedIn screen and then click “Groups You May Like” to see other suggestions.

- You should join all the suggested groups listed here  but remember that many of these groups review your profile before admitting you so you should have all your LinkedIn experience up to date before you join them.

- University boards are a great networking tool, so make sure to join your alumni groups as well.

- One of the greatest ways to become more visible in LinkedIn searches is to have recommendations from former or current colleagues. With LinkedIn’s new endorsement feature, you can now also list skills on your profile and receive endorsements for these skills.

 

There is no time like the present to kick-start your viral life, and LinkedIn is the perfect starting platform to evolve your clients’ business and your own.

 

Scott Sobel Offers PR Lessons Learned from the Initial Secrecy Surrounding Hillary Clinton’s Medical Condition

Thursday, January 3rd, 2013

Scott Sobel, President, Media & Communications Strategies, Inc. had the opportunity to share his thoughts about the PR lessons that can be learned from Hillary Clinton’s recent illness. His piece can be seen in Bulldog Reporter, the leading source of PR views, news and tools. Scott is a former corporate public relations practitioner and major market and TV network investigative journalist with a Media Psychology MA from Touro University Worldwide.

The text of the full story is below. You can also read it online HERE.

Initial Secrecy Surrounding Hillary Clinton’s Medical Condition Holds PR Lessons for Practitioners and Journalists, Bulldog Reporter

By Scott Sobel, MA, Media Psychology; President, Media & Communications Strategies

January 2, 2013

 

I just fielded a call from a frustrated State Department beat reporter at a major news services about government spokespersons not immediately releasing every bit of information concerning Secretary Clinton’s medical condition. The call to me for comment came a few hours before a clear announcement that Clinton would fully recover from a blood clot in her head. The reporter wondered why the government was apparently holding back? The conversation with the beat reporter carries media relations lessons for both reporters and those of us who are spokespersons.

 

The reporter’s job, of course, is to press hard for every bit of information and the reporter had the sense “State” was holding back. The implication was the spokespersons for Mrs. Clinton were doing the public a disservice. I disagreed.

 

I explained to the reporter that the government spokespersons were actually doing a responsible job by not succumbing to pressure and feeding speculative fires. Once the reporter heard what I believed were reasonable actions on the part of the spokespersons, the reporter calmed down and took a more balanced approach to the story. The overriding lesson here are 1) that a PR practitioner who calmly and logically explains reasons for actions and 2) understands a journalist’s needs 3) avoids conflict, 4) reduces the likelihood of a negative story and 5) builds credibility and a positive relationship.

 

Here’s a summation of my interview with the reporter:

 

All the stakeholders including journalists and the general public need to take a look at the reports about Mrs. Clinton’s condition through the eyes of others. It’s understood that reporters need to fill their news hole and, of course, break stories but consider what hangs in the balance.

 

The Secretary’s health and ability to represent the US and lead State have incredibly important implications and it is not at all irresponsible for spokespersons to be cautious initially and not completely transparent about her condition. Of course, Mrs. Clinton could also be a future Presidential candidate! You don’t want to make a communication mistake based on a premature statement that could impact any of those factors.

 

I further explained to the reporter that spokespersons absolutely do need to tell the truth as they know it and not mislead. It is much better to say, for instance, “we can’t answer some specific questions now because doctors are in the investigation and treatment phase,” as opposed to misdirection or an outright lie which will undermine the credibility of State and indeed the US government when final facts eventually are revealed. Look what happened at Benghazi … a very, very apt comparison in this case.

 

So what is acceptable? I thought any of the following statements were legitimate and should satisfy a reporter’s needs unless Mrs. Clinton was actually in grave jeopardy (which, as it turns out, she reportedly isn’t). Spokespersons can say that Clinton is getting the best medical care and, rather than fueling speculation, “we will report more specifics about her condition when we can. As for now, Mrs. Clinton, is recovering, doctors are investigating further and the duties of State are not in jeopardy as there is a system in place that deals with all contingencies (including staff illness) and decision-making.”

 

A government spokesperson should add information about all of the support sent to Mrs. Clinton from her famous family, colleagues and even heads of state. It is always good to personalize the folks or organization you represent.

 

A polite reminder to the journalist – the speculation surrounding Mrs. Clinton’s condition or the condition of anyone who is a leader does have cascading implications and must be handled very carefully and honestly. Think about the drama and results that surrounded the illness and eventual death of Apple CEO Steve Jobs.

 

Speculation about Jobs health affected stock, employee morale, competitors’ actions, consumer reaction to the Apple product and more. I asked the reporter to consider how Mrs. Clinton’s health correspondingly affects US reputation, foreign policy and international business despite her imminent resignation from her post.

 

Final thoughts. Relationship building and conversation between a PR practitioner and beat journalists before there are emergencies are great investments and will undoubtedly result in better coverage for you and your stakeholders. Getting to know the reporters and letting them know about your concerns and humanizing you and your job will definitely pay dividends.

 

 

Scott Sobel, President of Media & Communications Strategies, Comments on the Public’s Reaction to Hillary Clinton’s Health Issues

Wednesday, January 2nd, 2013

What is privacy these days to a public figure? Gone are the days when these individuals could keep their physical ailments under rap. It is amazing to think there was a time when public figures such as President Franklin D. Roosevelt could even hide the fact he was in a wheelchair. True, in almost all photographs he is seen sitting, but he is in a chair to give the illusion that his polio poliomyelitis was less than it was. In today’s world, these photographic tricks don’t work the way they used to and individuals such as Hillary Clinton find their medical problems on Wikipedia before they have even had a chance to call all their loved ones.

Scott Sobel, President of Media & Communications Strategies, recently was interviewed by Nicole Gaouette of Bloomberg to comment on a story about the media and public reaction to Hillary Clinton’s recent hospitalization. An excerpt of the story with Sobel’s comments can be read below:

Clinton Expected to Make Full Recovery from Blood Clot, Bloomberg
January 2, 2012

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was found to have a blood clot in a vein that runs between her brain and her skull, her doctors said today in a statement. Clinton has suffered no neurological damage or stroke, is in good spirits and is expected to make a full recovery, Dr. Lisa Bardack of the Mt. Kisco Medical Group and Dr. Gigi El- Bayoumi of George Washington University said in the statement released by the State Department.

Clinton’s hospitalization in New York City yesterday fueled rumors about her health, highlighting the issues raised by a public figure’s private health challenges. The secretary, named yesterday as the most admired woman in the U.S. in a poll by Gallup Inc., has been called a potential 2016 presidential candidate, heightening scrutiny of her condition.

“Her situation has remarkable, complex implications for politics and business around the world, and the process of government in the United States,” said Scott Sobel, president of Media & Communications Strategies based in Washington. “Her immediate and long-term condition is really important for a number of stakeholders, even — and it’s a very, very long list — of other countries.”

An administration official who has been monitoring Clinton’s progress said that at no point has she been incapacitated. The period when Clinton was least able to work was when she had the stomach virus, according to the official, who asked not to be identified discussing her health.

Throughout, Clinton has been keeping in regular touch with senior leadership at the State Department and the White House, according to the department.

The absence of detailed information on her condition until the latest report from Clinton’s physicians left an information vacuum. Speculation filled media from the Daily Beast website to the tabloid National Enquirer, whose cover screamed “Hillary Clinton Brain Cancer Drama!” Assistant Secretary of State Philippe Reines called the Enquirer report “absolute nonsense.”

The administration official said Clinton’s media team has tried to be forthright, issuing seven statements in the three and a half weeks the secretary has been ill, every time there has been a shift in her condition. The continued rumors might be driven in part by the intense public and media interest in Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, the official said. There are times when anything the Clintons do creates a rabid media environment, the official said.

Crisis management experts such as Sobel see no problem in the way Clinton’s team has responded. Sobel points to “everybody’s hunger to find out what’s going on, especially the media. They’ve got to fill that news hole.”

PR Disasters: A Year in Review and What Could Have Been Done

Thursday, December 13th, 2012

 

Business Insider recently published an article about the biggest PR Disasters of 2012, which left a lot of us wondering – What could have been done differently? The first, and obvious answer, is that the companies involved in these scandals would go back and retract their actions completely, yet in some cases, there were ways to contain or solve a problem before disaster struck.

 

One of the examples that the Business Insider article highlighted was retailers that chased in by offering specials during Hurricane Sandy. American Apparel offered a 20 percent off sale to customers if they typed “SANDYSALE” in the online checkout, stating that they created the sale “in case you’re bored during the storm.” Gap issued a similar sale tweet, but later apologized to customers after they took to Twitter. What both companies should have done is turned the online sales into an opportunity to help Hurricane Sandy Victims. Instead of saying “in case you’re bored,” a great PR strategy would have been to say:

 

Safe at home? Help those who aren’t. Enjoy our online sale today where a percentage of your purchase will go to help those in need.


This would increase sale volume but also show the corporation’s desire to help those in need.

 

An example of a company that actually did help those in need was Rusty’s Auto Salvage. They provided car owners affected by Hurricane Sandy the chance to recover maximum value for their cars. Car owners that were looking to salvage their cars could contact Rusty’s in order for a tow truck to come to the car owner’s location and then tow away the damaged car.  In addition to giving owners much needed money for their vehicles, Rusty’s Auto Salvage also set up a program where it donated money to Hurricane Sandy relief for each damaged car it purchased.

 

Another recent scandal was the George Washington University’s (GWU) admission to the inflation of grades of incoming freshman, which subsequently led to their removal as being ranked on the U.S. News & World Report’s annual best universities. According to a Huffington Post article, President Knapp of GWU stated “We were surprised by the decision of U.S. News to remove George Washington’s numerical ranking rather than to correct it in light of our disclosure. U.S. News data about GW is still available on the U.S. News website. We regret the error and have put safeguards in place to prevent such errors from occurring in the future.”

 

What would we have advised President Knapp to do? Apologize immediately, remove anyone who was involved in inflating the data, and offer to hire a team to reassess admissions data immediately. Reassessing the data could have helped GWU; they would most likely be lowered on U.S. News & World Report’s ranking, but not completely removed. Instead, GWU only said they were going to take measures to prevent something like this from happening this in the future. This may offer some comfort to future applicants, but it doesn’t change the fact that GWU now has a senior class heading into a precarious job market from an unranked university and hundreds of thousands of angry alumni who want to understand why their alma mater is being trashed in the press.  GW should be doing everything they can do to point to the successes of their alumni, while simultaneously focusing on future potential applicants. After all, it was Confucius who said “Study the past if you would define the future.”

 

Wishing everyone a happy and disaster-free 2013.

 

 

Excerpts from US News and World Report Story about Petraeus Scandal

Monday, November 26th, 2012

 

Jill Kelley Retains High Profile Crisis Manager, Despite Reportedly Being in Debt

By Elizabeth Flock

November 21, 2012

The scandal that began on Nov. 9 after CIA Director David Petraeus admitted an extramarital affair with his biographer continues to unfold this week, as those involved retain powerful lawyers, crisis managers and other experts needed to fix their potentially damaged reputations.

Among the most intriguing personalities of those involved appears to be Jill Kelley, the socialite and unpaid social liaison to MacDill Air Force Base whose E-Mails with Gen. John Allen may threaten his career. It was Kelley’s complaint to the FBI about threatening E-Mails from Petraeus’s biographer, Paula Broadwell, that kicked off the investigation.

Kelley reportedly lives a lavish lifestyle in Tampa, Fla., yet is deeply in debt. USA Today reports that she faces a number of lawsuits for credit card debts and foreclosures, many of which remain unresolved. E-Mails obtained by ABC News suggest Kelley may have tried to make up some of that debt, having eagerly tried to secure a multi-billion dollar Korean business deal earlier this year. The deal never went through.

Yet Kelley has just hired Abbe D. Lowell, a prominent Washington white-collar defense lawyer, the same lawyer who defended former North Carolina Senator John Edwards during his own extramarital scandal.

But it is unclear how Kelley could afford both Lowell and Smith, a crisis manager. Regions Bank reportedly brought a $1.8 million foreclosure lawsuit against Kelley and her husband in 2010, the same year Bank of America sued them.

Scott Sobel, president of the public relations and crisis management firm Media and Communications Strategies, suggests a possibility for how Kelly is able to afford both services. Sobel says lawyers and crisis managers known for this kind of work often work out a special deal with the client.

“They will take these cases on contingency, or they may be countersuing, or they may take it on in the hope and realization that their profile will be increased,” he says. “It’s an advertising investment.”

Sobel also states that the information not yet revealed may end up being the most salient to the case. “It’s the proverbial ‘devil in the details,’” he says.

To read the full article, click here: http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2012/11/21/jill-kelley-retains-high-profile-crisis-manager-despite-reportedly-being-in-debt