Archive for December, 2011

Lowe’s falls victim to pressure to pull advertising from ‘All-American Muslim Family’

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

In trying to avoid a controversy last week, it seems the home improvement company Lowe’s sawed its way into a bigger one.  From the looks of it Lowe’s had good intentions when it signed on to advertise on TLC’s “All-American Muslim Family,” a show which profiles the day-to-day lives of several families of Muslim faith in Michigan. But the company bowed to growing pressure from an influential anti-Muslim group to yank its advertising from the show. The move was provocative, generating strong reactions from people who either decried or supported the decision on Facebook and other social media.

We believe Lowe’s has the right to advertise wherever the company sees fit. And while we don’t presume to know all the inside information in a hypersensitive situation such as this one, Lowe’s was indeed caught between a rock and hard place because the negative publicity the anti-Muslim group had generated around the show’s advertising was already beginning to compromise its image. The anti-Muslim group was essentially waiting to pounce on Lowe’s and other advertisers knowing that in the post-September 11 America we live in it could galvanize support for its views.

However, criticism against Lowe’s actions continues to grow, so much so that the company is now deleting negative comments from its Facebook page. The key take-away from this situation is that companies need to be very clear about the pros and cons of the mediums they spend their public relations and advertising monies. This comes in handy when they need to defend their decisions or have a change of heart.  Lastly, remember that choosing a thoughtful communications approach and sticking with it supersedes experimenting with social media without alternative plans in place should a campaign backfire. We are hoping Lowe’s will roll out an effective plan to help remedy this controversy.

A Federal Judge Rules Bloggers Are Unprotected by Shield Laws, But Are PR Pros?

Monday, December 12th, 2011

The Associated Press reported late last week that a federal judge ruled that shield laws that cover journalists do not correspond to bloggers. The ruling has us wondering do shield laws protect public relations practitioners.

Crystal L. Cox blogs from her home in Eureka, Montana. Kevin Padrick, a subject of many of Cox’s blog posts, sued for defamation after Cox called him a thug and a thief because of how he managed bankruptcy proceedings with Obsidian Finance Group LLC.

This case shows the lack of case law protecting nontraditional media such as blogs. Cox was vulnerable due to lacking affiliation with a legitimate news outlet, having no journalism degree, and that shield law does not cover civil actions for defamation. Cox provided no adherence to journalist ethics or fact checking but said she was a journalist having written over 400 blogs the last 5 years.

This example raises a red flag for PR pros who post a news release without verifying information for accuracy. PR pros are not covered under shield law, which is why PR pros generally ask clients to indemnify them. PR pros affiliated with the Public Relations Society of America strive to follow its code of ethics. However, PR pros can still endanger their credibility with an incorrect news release and face legal damages like those that Cox has with a $2.5 million jury awarded to Padrick.

The issue could also be that this ruling creates precedence and puts everyone on notice that courts are becoming less tolerant of protecting public communications. If you write or say it, regardless of what you call yourself, you are vulnerable for litigation. We caution our clients, be it law firms, corporations, authors or celebrities that having communications professionals (like experienced pr counselors) is vital to getting your message out in the most effective manner and in a way that limits legal or repetitive liability.

The Long-Term Impact Of The Penn State Scandal

Friday, December 2nd, 2011

The Penn State scandal will undoubtedly impact the school’s reputation for a very long time because it touches on such emotional fears we all harbor about the safety of our children and betrayal by people in positions of trust and, indeed, sports heroes like Joe Paterno.

Most business or political scandals fade in time since they usually involve circumstances many of us can’t relate to or are very cerebral in nature.

The Penn State scandal strikes at the emotional areas of our brain and psychologists will tell you that we react first and most strongly based on emotions (limbic system) and not as strongly when the situations involves rational thinking.